-
Member
|
|
|
 |
Are you for gun control? Why or Why not?
After the shooting in Connecticut, I think the only guns civilians need are handguns and we have no need for assault rifles and things like that.
So what are your views on gun control?
You don't have to watch this, but it is some food for thought,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SZCxArSFRcw
|
|
| |
|
|
-
Got carried away.
|
|
|
 |
Re: Are you for gun control? Why or Why not?
|
|
| |
|
|
-
Senior Member
|
|
|
 |
Re: Are you for gun control? Why or Why not?
america is turning into the wild west again dude..i wonder when they will legalize official duels again....
|
|
| |
|
|
-
Member
|
|
|
 |
Re: Are you for gun control? Why or Why not?
 Originally Posted by zamki
It is needed...
Why do you think so?
|
|
| |
|
|
-
|
|
|
 |
Re: Are you for gun control? Why or Why not?
These shootings seem to be a blessing for the Obama administration. So they can prolong their goal to abolish the 2nd amendment
|
|
| |
|
|
-
Member
|
|
|
 |
Re: Are you for gun control? Why or Why not?
 Originally Posted by YowYan
These shootings seem to be a blessing for the Obama administration. So they can prolong their goal to abolish the 2nd amendment
I've never been to big of an Obama supporter since i'm Libertarian.
|
|
| |
|
|
-
Member
|
|
|
 |
Re: Are you for gun control? Why or Why not?
Yes, I think it should be tighten up but not gotten rid of. I mean it's a 200 years old amendment. We are no longer colonies. To clarify, though it says I am in England, I am from PA. Here for studies.
|
|
| |
|
|
-
Member
|
|
|
 |
Re: Are you for gun control? Why or Why not?
 Originally Posted by Otter
Yes, I think it should be tighten up but not gotten rid of. I mean it's a 200 years old amendment. We are no longer colonies. To clarify, though it says I am in England, I am from PA. Here for studies.
I think its too late to take away guns. Now, if the took them away, then the criminals would just keep theirs, and the innocent would be helpless, and people would just buy them of the black market anyway. But when they made the second amendment, they were thinking of militias.
|
|
| |
|
|
-
Mind rape....
|
|
|
 |
Re: Are you for gun control? Why or Why not?
No there need to be more guns in this world soo more people can die which means more criminals which leads to more police work which leads to more death for the police which leads to te end into a scary world were everyone is in danger which will lead to destroy the world from inside which will then will be a world for criminals and theifs which will make an eventually good community lol xD lmao
|
|
| |
|
|
-
Konohas Flasher
|
|
|
 |
Re: Are you for gun control? Why or Why not?
Why do civillians need guns?!? Make it very hard for anyone not the in armed forces to get a gun...
|
|
| |
|
|
-
Member
|
|
|
 |
Re: Are you for gun control? Why or Why not?
it is needed it's stupid to allow people to own guns. there's gun control in england and there is very little gun crime. people will obviously still get there hands on them but it will cut down psychopaths going around shooting people.
|
|
| |
|
|
-
|
|
|
 |
Re: Are you for gun control? Why or Why not?
Funny when the government cant solve an issue, they make more laws that, in the end, take away our rights.
|
|
| |
|
|
-
Member
|
|
|
 |
Re: Are you for gun control? Why or Why not?
 Originally Posted by SoulKiller
No there need to be more guns in this world soo more people can die which means more criminals which leads to more police work which leads to more death for the police which leads to te end into a scary world were everyone is in danger which will lead to destroy the world from inside which will then will be a world for criminals and theifs which will make an eventually good community lol xD lmao
...well then lmfao
|
|
| |
|
|
-
Member
|
|
|
 |
Re: Are you for gun control? Why or Why not?
 Originally Posted by NarutoDKurosaki
I think its too late to take away guns. Now, if the took them away, then the criminals would just keep theirs, and the innocent would be helpless, and people would just buy them of the black market anyway. But when they made the second amendment, they were thinking of militias.
Oh I don't mean take away guns, sorry if I worded that post poorly. I mean that the methods of obtaining a permit should be tighten up. I agree with you 100%, there is no way to keep people from getting guns if they truly want them. But these incidents have been caused by legally acquired guns.
|
|
| |
|
|
-
Senior Member
|
|
|
 |
Re: Are you for gun control? Why or Why not?
|
|
| |
|
|
-
General kakashi
|
|
|
 |
Re: Are you for gun control? Why or Why not?
|
|
| |
|
|
-
Member
|
|
|
 |
Re: Are you for gun control? Why or Why not?
 Originally Posted by kakashi owns all
Well, that's an easy one...she was an off duty deputy....SHE NEEDS GUNS! It's her job.
|
|
| |
|
|
-
Member
|
|
|
 |
Re: Are you for gun control? Why or Why not?
 Originally Posted by Narutohokage7
Why do civillians need guns?!? Make it very hard for anyone not the in armed forces to get a gun...
Let me play devils advocate. If someone has your wife at gunpoint, you're going to want to stop them. What do you do if you do not have a gun?
 Originally Posted by Kyuubibomb
it is needed it's stupid to allow people to own guns. there's gun control in england and there is very little gun crime. people will obviously still get there hands on them but it will cut down psychopaths going around shooting people.
Good point!
 Originally Posted by YowYan
Funny when the government cant solve an issue, they make more laws that, in the end, take away our rights.
Ikr...
 Originally Posted by Otter
Oh I don't mean take away guns, sorry if I worded that post poorly. I mean that the methods of obtaining a permit should be tighten up. I agree with you 100%, there is no way to keep people from getting guns if they truly want them. But these incidents have been caused by legally acquired guns.
i bet the redneck hunters all want guns so they can kill helpless animals for fun. But I believe the only guns we need are handguns, and it should be harder for people to obtain guns. Background checks, and everything need to into buying a gun, and I guarantee that it would lower murder rates.
|
|
| |
|
|
-
General kakashi
|
|
|
 |
Re: Are you for gun control? Why or Why not?
 Originally Posted by Otter
Well, that's an easy one...she was an off duty deputy....SHE NEEDS GUNS! It's her job.
say it was a normal person with a gun that killed the killer ......... the same story has happen repeatedly with normal people aswell
|
|
| |
|
|
-
Member
|
|
|
 |
Re: Are you for gun control? Why or Why not?
|
|
| |
|
|
-
Member
|
|
|
 |
Re: Are you for gun control? Why or Why not?
 Originally Posted by kakashi owns all
say it was a normal person with a gun that killed the killer ......... the same story has happen repeatedly with normal people aswell
Then no offense my friend, the example you provided doesn't help much because it wasn't a "normal" person. It was a deputy. Don't get me wrong, I do not mean guns should be outlawed. I just mean that "normal" people should have a harder time getting one. That's all.
|
|
| |
|
|
-
General kakashi
|
|
|
 |
Re: Are you for gun control? Why or Why not?
 Originally Posted by NarutoDKurosaki
Let me play devils advocate. If someone has your wife at gunpoint, you're going to want to stop them. What do you do if you do not have a gun?
Good point!
Ikr...
i bet the redneck hunters all want guns so they can kill helpless animals for fun. But I believe the only guns we need are handguns, and it should be harder for people to obtain guns. Background checks, and everything need to into buying a gun, and I guarantee that it would lower murder rates.
no it would not criminals would still get guns and kill people the only people that this hurts is law abiding people that now literally have to bring a knife to a gun fight. It would also make the black market ritcher
1) you can get a gun cheeper
2) get a gun faster
3) harder to track
so doing that would increase crime and hurt business
|
|
| |
|
|
-
General kakashi
|
|
|
 |
Re: Are you for gun control? Why or Why not?
 Originally Posted by Otter
Then no offense my friend, the example you provided doesn't help much because it wasn't a "normal" person. It was a deputy. Don't get me wrong, I do not mean guns should be outlawed. I just mean that "normal" people should have a harder time getting one. That's all.
reason i used that one was because it was 2 days after the shooting and no-one heard about it ....
read my earlier post about why making it hard to get guns is bad
|
|
| |
|
|
-
Member
|
|
|
 |
Re: Are you for gun control? Why or Why not?
 Originally Posted by kakashi owns all
no it would not criminals would still get guns and kill people the only people that this hurts is law abiding people that now literally have to bring a knife to a gun fight. It would also make the black market ritcher
1) you can get a gun cheeper
2) get a gun faster
3) harder to track
so doing that would increase crime and hurt business
I have to disagree with you on that. For regular citizens, if you had to go through background checks, thumbprints, etc., it would make getting a gun harder foe a citizen. Now as I stated earlier, people would still get guns through the black market. But just making it that much harder for a regular person could do a lot of good in the long run. But you have a good point!
|
|
| |
|
|
-
General kakashi
|
|
|
 |
Re: Are you for gun control? Why or Why not?
 Originally Posted by NarutoDKurosaki
I have to disagree with you on that. For regular citizens, if you had to go through background checks, thumbprints, etc., it would make getting a gun harder foe a citizen. Now as I stated earlier, people would still get guns through the black market. But just making it that much harder for a regular person could do a lot of good in the long run. But you have a good point!
that becomes state issues not national goverment as protected buy the 10th amendment
|
|
| |
|
|
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|