(DrProof) Raikiri's Extirpating Aptitude

[FTG V2]

Chill niggas....at least give the man some credit

Nice thread son+rep

Still, Obito>all your favorite characters:drive:

[★Sir Derp Obito]

[Derek1st]

You can tell your age because your word choice is off. Certainly an eloquent vernacular is preferrable but saying things like "stimuli cells" makes it clear that you do not understand the etimology of the words you use. I like your arguments and don't mean to focus on unnecessary criticisms but it really does rob from the actual quality of your post. And the "I don't use a thesaurus I just have a good vocabulary" is bs because I know they don't teach that **** in 8th/9th grade

[Knights Saotome]

very well thought out, and as far as i can tell is legit. although i dont think kakashi ever cut a lighting bolt, yet. but its nickname is more to amp it up and scare people. wouldnt be the first person (good or bad) to lie about how powerful he is to gain an advantage. also sasuke always corrects anyone who calls it raikiri, telling them its name is chidori. maybe sasuke dose this because he dosent care how strong people think it is. after all pretty much for everyone of sasuke's moves, someone knows a better, stronger version. not kirin thou.

[Knights Saotome]

3 man team to take on madrara? first off edo or not? and then ems, or rinniegan? without these facts itd be hard to pick.

[FTG V2]

Both

[BossManKakashi]

according to the anime the bolt of lighting he cut in half was done so when he had zero chakra remaining, i know its filler but the reference was shown in episode 288

[NowNoon]

Point taken, best regards Varrah.

Evidently.

My sincerest apologize; the fact that your intelligence doesn't allow you to comprehend the wording in this thread must annoy your stimuli cells.

Wow! *claps* ... now run along and go rep yourself for that one

[rikerslade]

Spot on Correct blaze! What you say is so true.

I Don't see the reason for people hating just because he upped his Vocab and created some alts. Apparently Majority of NB has a trust relationship with Dr.Proof?

News to me.

No one's hating on him. He just doesn't have much credibility left.

[Negative Knight]

Wow! *claps* ... now run along and go rep yourself for that one

Damn, that made me laugh

[rikerslade]

Damn, that made me laugh

NOO!! You removed me from your sig!

*Destroys Brazil.*

[Space Cowboy]

I feel like every thread he makes from now on is going to end up like this.

[Merita]

NOO!! You removed me from your sig!

*Destroys Brazil.*

*dies out of nowhere*

You country destroyer >_O

[Negative Knight]

NOO!! You removed me from your sig!

*Destroys Brazil.*

Your time was up my dear friend , if you make something more quotable than my current sig then we'll talk

[rikerslade]

*dies out of nowhere*

You country destroyer >_O

No!!! Merita!

*revives Brazil in twice its glory*

I'm sorry...

Your time was up my dear friend , if you make something more quotable than my current sig then we'll talk

I have my mission.

[yellowxflash]

A vowel please rachel

[UchihaKira]

Nice thread, alot of unneccesary big words. I mean extirpated.. really? It's quite apparent youre an intelligent individual but youre trying too hard to show it off.

[Fair Warning]

cool

[Shika88]

Hi DrProof,

Would you mind to use more common words in your next thread?
I understand, that you are trying hard to formulate nice and precise, but it would be of better proof of your intelligence if you would use appropriate words.

I gladly would like to enter such a discussion, but for me, and probably a big part of this forums multicultural community, this is beyond easy understanding.

On topic to your post:
I hardly criticize deductive logic on so called "manga facts".
Real world science just does not apply to a fiction manga world.

Kind regards,

Shika88

PS: You can't receive private messages.

[RaikageZero]

Conception


Constant falsity is directed into subsection when rivaling the current binomial techniques at hand; Raikiri and Kirin. Theoretically speaking, Raikiri was canonically stated to have extirpated a lightning bolt; albeit bystanders seem to delude presented evidence when paralleling said methods.. Thus reasoning for said threads construction; illuminating an important misconception: Raikiri invalidly cannot extirpate Kirin, insistently deluding canonical evidence stated within the manga.. "No problem can be solved from the same level of consciousness that created it." -Albert Einstein

The moment I read this whole paragraph, I said to myself, "Here we go again. Another piece written by a thesaurus junky." So many words within this piece are written out of context.

I understand that there is a division between many people due to the debate between Raikiri's capability to counter or negate Kirin, but the author using the word "subsection" does not describe the division between the debate. We have no division within a division regarding the stance of the people that participate in this debate.

The author used the word "binomial" to describe both Raikiri and Kirin, and I do not see any relationship between the two jutsus that can regard them to be binomial. Within the mathematical context, the written language will only make sense if "binomial" was used for the addition or subtraction of the two jutsus. In example, "The argument that sets apart the Kakashi aficionados from the Sasuke fanatics is the binomial effect of adding (or possibly subtracting) Raikiri and Kirin when these two jutsu clash in their full potential."

Then, the author mentions, "Raikiri canonically stated to have extirpated a lightning bolt." Upon reading further, the author only states that "Maito Gai astonishingly stated Kakashi severed a lightning bolt with said technique." Please... PLEASE... there is a difference between a canon and an account. The word "Canonically" does not apply as it was only an account of Maito Gai and not a widely accepted dogma by all shinobis (nor even for all the fanbase yet). Furthermore, as the author continues "canonically" with the word "stated," then there should be a general rule not an account that proves his statement. The aforementioned sentence started my judgment that this is clearly an annoying writing.

This is not where the slaughter of many of the words' context ends. I mean seriously, did he just say "bystanders"? Bystanders are spectators, watchers or witnesses of an event. We have seen the use of Raikiri and Kirin on separate episodes of battle, but Kishimoto never illustrated a battle between Kakashi and Sasuke in which Raikiri and Kirin are used against each other. None of us can possibly a spectator nor a witness of such event. As a writer, the word "observers" will suffice.

Moving along, the author writes "for said threads construction." I can bet that other readers were thrown off from this phrase. Before this phrase is introduced, there was no aforementioned thread to to begin with, but rather it comes after this phrase. That tense threw me off which then leads me to question his use of the word "construction." But then fortunately for us, that word was used correctly.

At least, the author did come up with a thesis! Woohoo for us, the author learned something from his writing classes: to write the focal argument of his piece. Then, what was that? A colon? Oh my gosh, he actually learned how to use it too! HOWEVER, his thesis becomes confusing. As the author uses the phrase, "invalidly cannot," this double negative makes it harder for everyone to understand the argument. Additionally, as the author writes "insistently deluding canonical evidence," the two words smack-dab in the middle bother me. The word "deludes/deluding" is used meaning to deceive, but the author fails at recognizing the fact that the direct object of this verb must be a person that is deceived not a thing that is misconstrued. Also, refer to the third paragraph above to read about the author's fallacy for the use of the word "canonical."

But wait, there's more! This guy unduly uses a quote from Albert Einstein, in which Mr. Einstein's quote does not provide evidence nor support his argument. What I see now is a moron who demands respect by portraying himself as an authority of knowledge much like Albert Einstein, thus a doctor of proof from his username DrProof.

--------

In conclusion, your evidence and argument is enough. Just make sure to throw out your style of writing in the garbage.

[Bad L Brian]

Well good day sir. Ok!
1st of all this is common sense, this thread was not needed to prove the obvious. 2nd I really have hard time believing that Kakashi ever cut a lightning bolt. He is just too slow for that and I know for sure that no one in Naruto is fast as light. So it should be simple that Kirin>Chidori/Raikiri.

[RaikageZero]

You, sir, have made my day.

[Two]

I don't like your over use of your elaborate vocabulary. First of all you know that a lot of younger people on here won't understand you, and it just makes you seem so arrogant...

The message of the thread is good though. But really you are just stating something that we pretty much all know, and that no one even cares about...

[Lady Luck]

what did i read.

[ghettoninja27]

But what's your thesis?