Page 19 of 24 « First ... 9151617181920212223 ... Last»
Results 361 to 380 of 471
  1. #361
    Banned
    Status
    Irabear is offline
    Gender
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    81
    This user has no status.
     

    Re: (DrProof) Raikiri's Extirpating Aptitude

    Quote Originally Posted by DrProof View Post
    You criticize, yet you know nothing of me? How misguided you are indeed.
    Eh, I mean you go for risky threads.
     
         
    Last edited by Irabear; 01-27-2013 at 09:59 AM.

  2. #362
    Banned
    Status
    DrProof is offline
    Gender
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    7,359
    Location
    New York City.
    This user has no status.
     



    Re: (DrProof) Raikiri's Extirpating Aptitude

    Quote Originally Posted by Irabear View Post
    Eh, I mean you go for risky threads.
    Taking risk is good however.. It's not always good to be "normal" or follow others.. Displaying leadership is the way to success; not that it matters on NB.
     
         

  3. #363
    ... Strict's Avatar
    Status
    Strict is online now
    Gender
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    3,847
    Location
    Germany
    The world is mine.
     

    Re: (DrProof) Raikiri's Extirpating Aptitude

    Quote Originally Posted by DrProof View Post
    Taking risk is good however.. It's not always good to be "normal" or follow others.. Displaying leadership is the way to success; not that it matters on NB.
    Yet you did it like Varrah. I mean the grammar and font. But I understand you, Candara is nice :b.
     
         

  4. #364
    Banned
    Status
    Irabear is offline
    Gender
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    81
    This user has no status.
     

    Re: (DrProof) Raikiri's Extirpating Aptitude

    Quote Originally Posted by DrProof View Post
    Taking risk is good however.. It's not always good to be "normal" or follow others.. Displaying leadership is the way to success; not that it matters on NB.
    I feel like I am at a God dam school lecture. I just said the thread was a risk and then you go on to talk about RL. Let us save this debate for a further date, on an appropriate thread <.<
     
         

  5. #365
    Banned
    Status
    DrProof is offline
    Gender
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Posts
    7,359
    Location
    New York City.
    This user has no status.
     



    Re: (DrProof) Raikiri's Extirpating Aptitude

    Quote Originally Posted by Strict View Post
    Yet you did it like Varrah. I mean the grammar and font. But I understand you, Candara is nice :b.
    It's the Varrah effect, however it was different from my own style; Candara is sexy, I also am trying out Gill Sans MT, and Garamond.
     
         

  6. #366
    キング Douryoku's Avatar
    Status
    Douryoku is offline
    Gender
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    759
    「イタチ:キング」
     

    Re: (DrProof) Raikiri's Extirpating Aptitude

    Quote Originally Posted by DrProof View Post
    It's the Varrah effect, however it was different from my own style; Candara is sexy, I also am trying out Gill Sans MT, and Garamond.
    'Twas I that coined this term. :scorps:
     
         

  7. #367
    Member Khunka's Avatar
    Status
    Khunka is offline
    Gender
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    275
    Fresh from Heartbreak </3
     

    Re: (DrProof) Raikiri's Extirpating Aptitude

    Good your back Doc ! :D
     
         

  8. #368
    Member Jimmyrustler's Avatar
    Status
    Jimmyrustler is offline
    Gender
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    191
    Location
    Romania
    sploogeman
     

    Re: (DrProof) Raikiri's Extirpating Aptitude

    Quote Originally Posted by Bad L Brian View Post
    Well good day sir. Ok!
    1st of all this is common sense, this thread was not needed to prove the obvious. 2nd I really have hard time believing that Kakashi ever cut a lightning bolt. He is just too slow for that and I know for sure that no one in Naruto is fast as light. So it should be simple that Kirin>Chidori/Raikiri.
    lolwut lightning=/=light it doesn't travel at the speed of light...
     
         

  9. #369
    Member Jimmyrustler's Avatar
    Status
    Jimmyrustler is offline
    Gender
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    191
    Location
    Romania
    sploogeman
     

    Re: (DrProof) Raikiri's Extirpating Aptitude

    Quote Originally Posted by RaikageZero View Post
    The moment I read this whole paragraph, I said to myself, "Here we go again. Another piece written by a thesaurus junky." So many words within this piece are written out of context.

    I understand that there is a division between many people due to the debate between Raikiri's capability to counter or negate Kirin, but the author using the word "subsection" does not describe the division between the debate. We have no division within a division regarding the stance of the people that participate in this debate.

    The author used the word "binomial" to describe both Raikiri and Kirin, and I do not see any relationship between the two jutsus that can regard them to be binomial. Within the mathematical context, the written language will only make sense if "binomial" was used for the addition or subtraction of the two jutsus. In example, "The argument that sets apart the Kakashi aficionados from the Sasuke fanatics is the binomial effect of adding (or possibly subtracting) Raikiri and Kirin when these two jutsu clash in their full potential."

    Then, the author mentions, "Raikiri canonically stated to have extirpated a lightning bolt." Upon reading further, the author only states that "Maito Gai astonishingly stated Kakashi severed a lightning bolt with said technique." Please... PLEASE... there is a difference between a canon and an account. The word "Canonically" does not apply as it was only an account of Maito Gai and not a widely accepted dogma by all shinobis (nor even for all the fanbase yet). Furthermore, as the author continues "canonically" with the word "stated," then there should be a general rule not an account that proves his statement. The aforementioned sentence started my judgment that this is clearly an annoying writing.

    This is not where the slaughter of many of the words' context ends. I mean seriously, did he just say "bystanders"? Bystanders are spectators, watchers or witnesses of an event. We have seen the use of Raikiri and Kirin on separate episodes of battle, but Kishimoto never illustrated a battle between Kakashi and Sasuke in which Raikiri and Kirin are used against each other. None of us can possibly a spectator nor a witness of such event. As a writer, the word "observers" will suffice.

    Moving along, the author writes "for said threads construction." I can bet that other readers were thrown off from this phrase. Before this phrase is introduced, there was no aforementioned thread to to begin with, but rather it comes after this phrase. That tense threw me off which then leads me to question his use of the word "construction." But then fortunately for us, that word was used correctly.

    At least, the author did come up with a thesis! Woohoo for us, the author learned something from his writing classes: to write the focal argument of his piece. Then, what was that? A colon? Oh my gosh, he actually learned how to use it too! HOWEVER, his thesis becomes confusing. As the author uses the phrase, "invalidly cannot," this double negative makes it harder for everyone to understand the argument. Additionally, as the author writes "insistently deluding canonical evidence," the two words smack-dab in the middle bother me. The word "deludes/deluding" is used meaning to deceive, but the author fails at recognizing the fact that the direct object of this verb must be a person that is deceived not a thing that is misconstrued. Also, refer to the third paragraph above to read about the author's fallacy for the use of the word "canonical."

    But wait, there's more! This guy unduly uses a quote from Albert Einstein, in which Mr. Einstein's quote does not provide evidence nor support his argument. What I see now is a moron who demands respect by portraying himself as an authority of knowledge much like Albert Einstein, thus a doctor of proof from his username DrProof.

    --------

    In conclusion, your evidence and argument is enough. Just make sure to throw out your style of writing in the garbage.
    /thread
     
         

  10. #370
    Senior Member BloodSeed's Avatar
    Status
    BloodSeed is offline
    Gender
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    3,494
    This user has no status.
     

    Re: (DrProof) Raikiri's Extirpating Aptitude

    this thread is full of bullsh!tery!!!!
     
         

  11. #371
    -Vegeta's Avatar
    Status
    -Vegeta is offline
    Gender
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    26,663
    Location
    Amegakure no Sato
    Status: > than Kakarot
     



    Re: (DrProof) Raikiri's Extirpating Aptitude

    Not a good return thread for you. Dig a little deeper next time. Using a few large words that kids your age don't know doesn't change the substance. You could have summed it all up in 1 or 2 sentences....

    That being said, I will agree with your theory. BUt.......I think like all other things, it would also require a lot of luck and perfect timing on Kakashi's part.
     
         

  12. #372
    Member Rigswattwa's Avatar
    Status
    Rigswattwa is offline
    Gender
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    334
    Location
    INDIA
    This user has no status.
     

    Re: (DrProof) Raikiri's Extirpating Aptitude

    "224,000 mph -- or about 3,700 miles per second."

    224,000 mph=3,700 miles per second

    gUYS STOP READING THE THREAD WHEN YOU SEE THIS. DrPROOF REALLY SUCK AT MATHS
     
         

  13. #373
    -Vegeta's Avatar
    Status
    -Vegeta is offline
    Gender
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    26,663
    Location
    Amegakure no Sato
    Status: > than Kakarot
     



    Re: (DrProof) Raikiri's Extirpating Aptitude

    I think it's just a matter of time before he(?) realizes putting ones name in a thread is not a good look. No one else does it, not even the other guy who used to do it.
     
         

  14. #374
    Member Heizenberg's Avatar
    Status
    Heizenberg is offline
    Gender
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    172
    Location
    Albuquerque, New Mexico
    I AM THE DANGER, SKYLER, YOU
    IMBECILE
     

    Re: (DrProof) Raikiri's Extirpating Aptitude

    Please try not to write so classy next time dude. We're discussing Naruto, not quantum physics. It just looks so lame when you try so hard...
    Sincerely Heizenberg
     
         

  15. #375
    Member ChiefHermit's Avatar
    Status
    ChiefHermit is offline
    Gender
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    785
    Location
    srsly?
    This user has no status.
     

    Re: (DrProof) Raikiri's Extirpating Aptitude

    Quote Originally Posted by slaton02 View Post
    Is this really Drproof? If so are you ready to get owned again?
    rofl gg
     
         

  16. #376
    King of Tea and Biscuits Captain Jimjam's Avatar
    Status
    Captain Jimjam is offline
    Gender
    Join Date
    Dec 2012
    Posts
    296
    Location
    Mars
    This user has no status.
     

    Re: (DrProof) Raikiri's Extirpating Aptitude

    Lurvin' the vocab. Very nice indeed. :D Anyway, on topic Jimjam, on topic:
    Nice comparison, I'm pleased you've got sufficient evidence to back up your statement, unlike lots of other threads... I do agree with you, Raikiri might have the capability to cut through and thereby counter Kirin. Kirin is technically a controlled lightning bolt of immense power, but minus the fact it's very powerful, it's still very much a bolt of lightning. So yes, I don't see why Raikiri wouldn't be able to cut through Kirin, if given the opportunity.
     
         

  17. #377
    Dragon Sage hatake axel's Avatar
    Status
    hatake axel is offline
    Gender
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    632
    This user has no status.
     

    Re: (DrProof) Raikiri's Extirpating Aptitude

    Quote Originally Posted by DrProof View Post
    How'd it go?
    I had to leave that thread, it was going nowhere.
    They started making up he most weird "arguments".
     
         

  18. #378
    Goldmember Unbiased King's Avatar
    Status
    Unbiased King is offline
    Gender
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    770
    Location
    Between your toes
    Do the ends always justify the
    means?
     

    Re: (DrProof) Raikiri's Extirpating Aptitude

    But look what you said, a lightning bolt generally moves at 224k mph or 62 miles per second.

    Sure, it can be inferred that he can see the lightning bolt/kirin, but would he be able to react to it at all?

    http://narutobase.net/manga/Naruto/037/18
     
         
    Last edited by Unbiased King; 01-27-2013 at 03:47 PM.

  19. #379
    Boss TrollingSage's Avatar
    Status
    TrollingSage is offline
    Gender
    Join Date
    Sep 2011
    Posts
    5,206
    This user has no status.
     

    Re: (DrProof) Raikiri's Extirpating Aptitude

    Quote Originally Posted by RaikageZero View Post
    The moment I read this whole paragraph, I said to myself, "Here we go again. Another piece written by a thesaurus junky." So many words within this piece are written out of context.

    I understand that there is a division between many people due to the debate between Raikiri's capability to counter or negate Kirin, but the author using the word "subsection" does not describe the division between the debate. We have no division within a division regarding the stance of the people that participate in this debate.

    The author used the word "binomial" to describe both Raikiri and Kirin, and I do not see any relationship between the two jutsus that can regard them to be binomial. Within the mathematical context, the written language will only make sense if "binomial" was used for the addition or subtraction of the two jutsus. In example, "The argument that sets apart the Kakashi aficionados from the Sasuke fanatics is the binomial effect of adding (or possibly subtracting) Raikiri and Kirin when these two jutsu clash in their full potential."

    Then, the author mentions, "Raikiri canonically stated to have extirpated a lightning bolt." Upon reading further, the author only states that "Maito Gai astonishingly stated Kakashi severed a lightning bolt with said technique." Please... PLEASE... there is a difference between a canon and an account. The word "Canonically" does not apply as it was only an account of Maito Gai and not a widely accepted dogma by all shinobis (nor even for all the fanbase yet). Furthermore, as the author continues "canonically" with the word "stated," then there should be a general rule not an account that proves his statement. The aforementioned sentence started my judgment that this is clearly an annoying writing.

    This is not where the slaughter of many of the words' context ends. I mean seriously, did he just say "bystanders"? Bystanders are spectators, watchers or witnesses of an event. We have seen the use of Raikiri and Kirin on separate episodes of battle, but Kishimoto never illustrated a battle between Kakashi and Sasuke in which Raikiri and Kirin are used against each other. None of us can possibly a spectator nor a witness of such event. As a writer, the word "observers" will suffice.

    Moving along, the author writes "for said threads construction." I can bet that other readers were thrown off from this phrase. Before this phrase is introduced, there was no aforementioned thread to to begin with, but rather it comes after this phrase. That tense threw me off which then leads me to question his use of the word "construction." But then fortunately for us, that word was used correctly.

    At least, the author did come up with a thesis! Woohoo for us, the author learned something from his writing classes: to write the focal argument of his piece. Then, what was that? A colon? Oh my gosh, he actually learned how to use it too! HOWEVER, his thesis becomes confusing. As the author uses the phrase, "invalidly cannot," this double negative makes it harder for everyone to understand the argument. Additionally, as the author writes "insistently deluding canonical evidence," the two words smack-dab in the middle bother me. The word "deludes/deluding" is used meaning to deceive, but the author fails at recognizing the fact that the direct object of this verb must be a person that is deceived not a thing that is misconstrued. Also, refer to the third paragraph above to read about the author's fallacy for the use of the word "canonical."

    But wait, there's more! This guy unduly uses a quote from Albert Einstein, in which Mr. Einstein's quote does not provide evidence nor support his argument. What I see now is a moron who demands respect by portraying himself as an authority of knowledge much like Albert Einstein, thus a doctor of proof from his username DrProof.

    --------

    In conclusion, your evidence and argument is enough. Just make sure to throw out your style of writing in the garbage.
    My thoughts exactly.
     
         

  20. #380
    Youth Instructor Green Beast Of Konoha's Avatar
    Status
    Green Beast Of Konoha is offline
    Gender
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Posts
    362
    Location
    United States Of America
    Yooooouuuuuuth!!!!!
     

    Re: (DrProof) Raikiri's Extirpating Aptitude

    Raikiri > Lightning bolt

    Kirin = Greater Lightning bolt

    Lightning Transmission = Greater Raikiri

    Lightning Transmission > Kirin
     
         

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •