Often times, people will bash on Naruto wiki saying things like, "Its unreliable because it is written by fans." and that "ANYONE can edit it."
Well my thing is this, in debates on here, 95% of them are biased, trollish, or Fapboy VS Fanboy filled with insults. The 5% are actual ones who use reason (T Bogar..cough cough.)
So why is it that people say Naruto Wikia is unreliable as if the users on Narutobase are? No. At least on Naruto Wikia, the information is neutral. Nobody is posting to make a character or technique seem OP or seem useless. Most, if not all of it is accurate. I would say 95%, I have never been mislead whenever I wanted to look something up, whereas on here, Everyone has different opinions, and accoridng to everyone, they are ABSOLUTLEY without a doubt RIGHT about it. No, I say Naruto Wikia is more credible than trying to find out about anything naruto related on this forum except for new chapter releases. How can you say this forum is more credible when Naruto Wikia even has links to manga references and anime ones plus more and is made for all fans of all characters?
The logic we get is.
"Sasori is the fastest AERIAL ninja."
" Totsuka gg, Kamui gg, Sasuke speed blitz gg."
Im sorry, but with 95% of this going on, how can anyone say Naruto Wikia isnt credible? lol