Re: Lucci vs Crocodile
Nope. Just because I never posted saying Lucci can't touch Croc doesn't mean I think he can touch Croc. Don't assume my viewpoints.
Originally Posted by chopstickchakra
So? Did my omission of how Lucci would win make any of the things I said about Croc not being able to injure Lucci false? No.
You opposed the thought of Croc winning but proposed no manner in how his opponent could win, if you're disagreeing and not presenting a counter, that's a meaningless contribution.
Posts: Crocodile defeats Lucci
Your post doesn't challenge anything
Me: Crocodile is too slow to actually hit Lucci, so he can't actually win.
You: You challenged nothing.
I said Croc can win IF he lands a Barchan, but that in all likelihood he wouldn't hit that(my challenge) due to the fact that Lucci is too fast for Crocodile(my support).
it just denies it, as is typical, to challenge it you would need to present support to the opposite and you even acknowledged Croc CAN win so you didn't challenge anything.
So what exactly are you missing here?
Uhmmmm Rob Lucci doesn't need to win for Crocodile to have no way to win. A draw is a concept that exists. Also known as a tie, deadlock, and no contest, you can google it if you're still confused.
You acknowledge a way Croc can win, present no way his opponent can win and then claim Croc can't win. Very meaningful contribution indeed.
I claimed Croc can't win based on the facts that:
1. Croc only has one thing that can feasible hurt Lucci
2. Croc is too slow to ever land this hit on Lucci
Again, a draw is a thing. Neither of them wins without Lucci bypassing Croc's Logia intangibility.